In Taylor, read sections 10.1 for today, and 10.2 for Wednesday.
For a single particle, p = mv, L = r × p, and T = ½ m v².
In chapters 3 and 4 we derived "Newton's Laws" for extended objects, with particular emphasis on the laws for rigid bodies. We found that we can treat the motion of a rigid body in two parts:
But the derivation for the second part was basically limited to rotations about a fixed axis. We now wish to generalize this result to rotation about an arbitrary, and not necessarily fixed axis. Begin by recalling the definition of the center of mass and total momtentum of an object.
The center of mass is given by the vector expression
and the total momentum of the object is
where the sums are over all the individual point masses that make up the object. For a continuous object, the sums can be taken over to integrals. For example, the position of the center of mass becomes
where the integral is over the entire mass distribution (volume).
Since we will often deal with the CM, it is useful to express the angular momentum in terms of the CM of the system. Begin by defining the position of a point relative to the CM, r'i = ri - RCM, and likewise the velocity in terms of the CM velocity and the velocity relative to the CM, v'i = VCM - vi. The total angular momentum is the sum of the angular momentum over all particles:
This can be expanded to give four terms:
This can be simplified by noting that the second and third terms on the right are zero, and the last term can be expressed in terms of individual momenta to get
To reach this solution I've used ∑i mi v'i = 0 and ∑i mir'i = 0. Can you see why these are true? Hint, try calculating RCM by expressing the coordinates in terms of the CM coordinates and the coordinate of the CM.
The above result says that the total angular momentum of a system of particles is composed of two parts: the angular momentum of the CM and the angular momentum about the CM. The second part is what we normally think of as the rotation or spinning of something. The first part we might consider as the angular momentum due to the orbit, or path of our system. This is quite a convenient occurance; the center of mass is a special point indeed.
where Lorbit = RCM × PCM and Lrot = ∑i r'i × p'i.
This is beautifully illustrated by the motion of a planet. The planet (or its CM) orbits the sun, and therefore has orbital angular momentum. It can also spin on an axis through the CM, giving it rotational angular momentum. Note also, that the directions of the orbital and rotational angular momenta don't have to line up. For the planets in our solar system, they generally don't (the earth's axis of rotation is tilted by 23.5° to the direction of its orbital angular momentum).
For a system of n particles the kinetic energy is the sum of the individual kinetic energies:
Now if we express vi in terms of the CM velocity and the velocity relative to the CM, we can break the kinetic energy into a piece due to the motion of the CM and a piece due to the relative motions of the particles.
Inserting this into the kinetic energy expression, and noting that the remaining dot product (third term) sums to zero, we get:
In words, the total kinetic energy of a system is equal to the kinetic energy due to the motion of the CM plus the kinetic energy due to motion of particles of the system relative to their CM. This latter part can come from rotation of the system (a collective motion of all the particles of the system), or the motion of individual particles of the system. If the system of particles are part of a rigid body, then all the relative velocities, v'i, are due to the object's rotation about the CM.
An alternative way to think of the kinetic energy comes from realizing that the derivation, up to the simplification of the expansion for vi², doesn't depend on using the CM. That is, we can replace VCM by the velocity of any point on the object, V, such that vi = V + v'i, and write the kinetic energy as
Now if we choose the reference point to be one with zero (instantaneous) velocity such that V=0, the kinetic energy is just the second term
Written this way, we find that the kinetic energy of the object is the rotational energy about any fixed point.
We can write the potential energy for the conservative forces on a system. (Any non-conservative forces must be handled separately.) Write the potential as the sum of two parts, the potential energies due to internal and external forces separately, U = Uext + Uint.
The internal potential energy depends on the relative separation of masses in the object, Uint = ∑i<j Uij(rij) where rij is the separation between two particles. In a rigid body, the separations are fixed, therefore the internal potential energy is a constant and can be neglected. The overall potential energy then reduces to U = Uext.
© 2015 Robert Harr